|
 |
|
An Abu Dis
resident in Issa Freij and Nicholas Wadimoff's film Last Supper.
|
"Where is the
world? Where is the world?"-Abu Dis Resident
Issa Freij and Nicolas Wadimoff's documentary Last Supper (Abu Dis)
examines a Palestinian village on the outskirts of Jerusalem that is
slowly being enclosed by the Israeli apartheid wall. The twenty-six minute
film exposes the violations of human rights that are resulting from the
supposed "security" measurements the Israeli government has taken over the
past six years.
As
the wall expands, Palestinians continue to be cut off from their
communities, land, farms, families and social infrastructures. Freij and
Wadimoff interview Abu Dis residents, as the construction of the wall
takes place literally in their front and back yards.
As several narratives are intertwined with striking shots of Palestinian
landscape interrupted by the concrete monstrosity, the viewer begins to
understand the extent and depth of the psychological and physical
detriments that are resulting from the imprisonment of the entire
community.
Through individual commentaries given by Abu Dis residents, the viewer
learns that a denial of every aspect of Palestinian life is taking place
as the suffocation and further ghettoization of Palestinians results from
the building of the wall. Although the Israeli Ministry of Defense states
that, "The matrix of civilian bonds and ties- economic, educational,
medical etc, between Palestinian villages and cities has been thoroughly
examined as well as the way they were affected by the construction of the
Security Fence," the interviews shown in Last Supper prove
otherwise, as villagers discuss being cut off from their neighbors,
schools, hospitals and employment opportunities.
|
 |
|
An image of the wall in Abu Dis in Last Supper, screened at the
Chicago Palestine Film Festival. |
In addition, the
viewer learns that with the introduction of illegal Israeli settlements
comes the governmental excuse that by law, Israel can control Palestinian
land if it feels its citizens residing in the settlements are in a state
of emergency. This allows the IDF to move about freely and "legally" in
Abu Dis, though with its vast weaponry and history of aggression, such
legal justification is superfluous.
While the film follows the constructing of the wall in front of one Abu
Dis home, the viewer is shown the complexity of the situation, as one of
the home owners begins the film by trying to find ways to resolve the
trauma she is experiencing by transcending it and accepting her family's
fate of practically being cut off from the outside world. However, the
deeper the viewer is taken into the narrative, the more one realizes that
to live in such conditions and to somehow mentally transcend them would be
impossible for any human being.
|
 |
|
Two Abu Dis residents face the construction of the apartheid wall. |
The individual
narratives of the Abu Dis residents can be an area of strength for the
film. Though, the specific shots that frame these interviews are
inconsistent with the stunning scenes of Palestinian landscape contrasted
against the stark imprisoning wall. Little attention is given to cinematic
capacities during interviews, as subjects are simply shown speaking. Shots
of the residents within the confined landscape, such as two men sitting
with their backs to the camera as a concrete slab of the wall is laid,
could carry the entire cinematic journey, especially the narration of the
film. Moments of silence better capture the surreal and maddening
environment the Israeli government has created.
The opening sequence specifically encapsulates the filmmakers' patience
with capturing a scene that demands the close examination and time and
space needed to impact the viewer. A methodical sweep from a village home
through the beginning slab of the encroaching wall, out to what little
view of Jerusalem is left in the distance, provides the viewer with a
clear demonstration of just how imposing and fatalistic the structure is.
From this opening sequence, one can already imagine the sense of
suffocation the residents describe later on in the film.
Additionally, the soundtrack of the film does not carry the weight of the
issue at hand. A more complicated score, one whose sound does not detract
from the situation's severity, would better compliment the film.
|
 |
|
Sheep by the apartheid wall in Abu Dis, in Last Supper. |
Ironically as
Last Supper shows in this year's Chicago Palestine Film Festival, we
find that the United States is adopting similar tactics of the IDF with
the current administration announcing plans to send 6,000 Guard troops to
the Mexican border. This comes after months of some communities in the
South West having relied on "Minute Men," armed civilians who patrolled
the border to prevent "illegal" border crossings. Such events parallel the
operations of the IDF along with illegal settlers, who have been known to
use armed force in their interactions with nearby Palestinians.
|
 |
|
Abu Dis residents in Last Supper, by Issa Freij and Nicholas
Wadimoff. |
Last Supper
is a call to action, as more Palestinian families are experiencing similar
fates of Abu Dis residents in the name of Israeli "security." With the
most powerful country in the world supporting the wall and some of its
major corporations benefiting financially from its construction (such as
the Caterpillar corporation, whose equipment is shown in the film); is it
only a matter of time before Americans see documentaries being made on
their own apartheid wall?
Maymanah Farhat is a
freelance writer and researcher of visual arts and culture, and is a
specialist in Modern and Contemporary Arab art. EI has sponsored the
Chicago Palestine Film Festival since its inception.